How to write for featured snippets and AI answers
A featured snippet is won by formatting, not by markup. Put the answer in about forty to sixty words directly under a heading that matches the question, use a numbered list for a process and a table for a comparison. The same three shapes are what an assistant lifts when it cites a page, which is why this is one piece of work and not two.
By Théophile Louvart, founder of Porteur · Updated 15 September 2026 · Markdown
The three shapes a snippet takes
Google builds a featured snippet by lifting part of a page that already ranks. It does not ask you, there is no markup to add, and the only thing you control is whether a liftable passage exists.
| Shape | Query it answers | What has to be on your page |
|---|---|---|
| Paragraph | What is X, why does Y happen | About forty to sixty words directly under a heading that matches the question |
| List | How to do X, steps to Y | A numbered list, with a heading that names the number of steps |
| Table | X vs Y, prices, sizes, comparisons | A real HTML table with short cells and a header row |
You are not writing a page for a snippet. You are writing a good page and making sure it contains one passage in the right shape.
The paragraph pattern
This is the one that wins most often and the one most pages get wrong, because writers warm up before answering.
- Heading: the question, phrased the way it is searched. “What is a soft 404?” beats “Understanding soft 404 errors”.
- First sentence: the definition or the answer, complete on its own, with no pronoun pointing back at the heading.
- Next one or two sentences: the qualification that stops the answer being misleading.
- Then stop, and start a new paragraph for the detail.
| Not liftable | Liftable |
|---|---|
| “This is one of the most common questions we get asked, and the answer depends on several factors.” | “A soft 404 is a page that returns a 200 status while reading, to a person or to Google, as an error or an empty page.” |
| “As mentioned above, it depends on your setup.” | “Invoice in the client's currency when you can absorb the conversion, and in yours when you cannot.” |
The list pattern, for a process
A how-to query is usually answered with a list. Two things decide whether yours is the one shown.
Name the number in the heading
“How to share a calendar link in four steps” tells the engine how many items to expect and tells the reader how much work it is.
Use a real ordered list
Numbered list markup, not paragraphs that begin with “First,” and “Next,”. The structure is what gets lifted.
Keep each step to one line
A step that runs three sentences will be truncated. Put the explanation in the paragraph under the list, not inside the item.
Make the steps self-contained
Each one starts with a verb and names the screen or the file. “Open /settings/scheduling” rather than “Then go there”.
The table pattern, for a comparison
Comparison queries are answered with a table more often than writers expect, and a table is also the single easiest thing for an assistant to quote accurately.
- A real HTML table with a header row. An image of a table is invisible; a list of bullets is not a table.
- Short cells: a value, a unit, a short phrase. Long prose in a cell defeats the shape.
- Three to five columns. Wider tables get cut and are unreadable on a phone anyway.
- The first column is the thing being compared, so the row makes sense out of context.
This is also the shape that survives being pasted into a chat, which is how a lot of comparison reading now happens.
Why assistants quote the same three shapes
Search-backed assistants retrieve pages from an index and cite the ones that answer the question directly, with clear structure, consistent naming, and lists, comparisons and figures they can quote. That description is the three shapes above.
- The liftable paragraph is what a written answer paraphrases, with your page as the citation.
- The numbered list survives summarisation better than prose, because the order carries meaning.
- The table gives an assistant values it can state without interpreting them.
- Consistent naming matters more than it does for Google: call your product and its features the same thing on every page, or the answer will not connect them.
Two preconditions sit under all of it. You have to be in the index the assistant reads, and the answering crawlers have to be allowed in your robots.txt. There is no submission mechanism and no way to buy a citation.
Finding the queries worth trying
Snippets are lifted from pages that already rank, usually from the first page of results. So this is a job for the queries where you are close, not the ones where you are nowhere.
List your queries in positions three to ten
The Performance report in Search Console, Queries tab, filtered by position. These are the candidates.
Keep the ones phrased as questions
What, why, how, when, and comparisons. Navigational and transactional queries rarely show a snippet.
Search each one and look
Is there a snippet? What shape is it? Who holds it? If one exists, you know exactly which shape to write.
Add the passage to your page
A heading that matches the question, the answer under it in the right shape. You are adding a passage, not rewriting the page.
Wait, then check again
Give it a few weeks. Snippets change hands often, and holding one is not permanent.
What a snippet costs you, and when it is worth it
A snippet that fully answers the question can reduce the clicks on that query: the searcher got what they came for. This is the honest trade and it is worth making with your eyes open.
- Worth it: comparison, product and how-to queries where the snippet answers step one and the detail is on your page. The snippet acts as the advert.
- Worth it: queries where you are not yet first. A snippet puts you above the page that outranks you.
- A trade: definition queries where the answer is the whole page. You get the visibility and fewer clicks. Take it if the brand exposure matters to you, skip it if the page exists to convert.
- Not a strategy: writing thin question-and-answer pages hoping for snippets. They win nothing and they are the pattern Google's scaled content guidance describes.
The same trade applies to being cited by an assistant, with one difference: the citation reaches people who were never going to see a results page at all.
Questions
No. Featured snippets are lifted from the page's own content, and there is no markup that asks for one. Structured data earns other things, such as breadcrumbs and product details, but not the snippet.
About forty to sixty words, directly under a heading that matches the question, and complete on its own. Longer gets truncated; shorter often lacks the qualification that makes it correct.
Rarely. Snippets are taken from pages that already rank well for the query, so the work starts with getting onto the first page and then adding the liftable passage.
It is more visible and it can take clicks away, because a searcher who gets a full answer may not click anything. It is worth most on queries where your page holds the detail the snippet cannot fit.
Yes, and for the same reason. Assistants cite pages that answer directly with clear structure, lists, comparisons and quotable figures. The extra requirements are being in the index they read and allowing the answering crawlers in robots.txt.
Sources
Check my site, free
Paste your URL and the free check reads the searches around your site in about thirty seconds, including which of them show a snippet or an AI answer, and who holds it today.
- Free check, no card
- Read-only, your own accounts
- Readable by your agent
Read next
- GlossaryFeatured snippet
- GuidePeople also ask: turning Google’s questions into sections
- GuideWriting pages AI assistants can cite
- GuideHow to appear in Google’s AI Overviews
- GuideStriking distance keywords: the searches one page from the light
- GlossaryZero-click search
- Guiderobots.txt for AI crawlers: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and what to allow
- GuideAnswer engine optimization: the older name for being the answer